NormaHelp

Modules · For the quality manager

Opening and working a CAPA

How the work moves

Corrective action
  1. 1Contain
  2. 2Find the cause
  3. 3Implement action
  4. 4Verify effectiveness

Open: Quality Events > CAPA. Investigators: authorized Quality Manager, Engineer, Department Manager, or QA Technician. Other authorized roles can open CAPAs. Effectiveness closure: Quality Manager or administrator.

Open the CAPA from its source

When the issue came from an NC, audit finding, supplier, or out-of-tolerance assessment, use Raise CAPA on that source. Otherwise choose Open CAPA on the register for a standalone CAPA with a source and a clear description. Record containment separately from the corrective action.

A CAPA record: its source relationship, the analysis, actions, document changes and the effectiveness verification.
A CAPA record: its source relationship, the analysis, actions, document changes and the effectiveness verification.

The record a CAPA was raised from is its primary source. When the same failure shows up in more than one place, cite the others rather than opening a second CAPA:

  1. Open the CAPA's Linked records tab and find Sources.
  2. Under Cite another source, choose the nonconformance, complaint, audit finding, out-of-tolerance assessment, or supplier. Only records you can see are offered.
  3. Optionally say why this record too, then choose Add source. It also appears on the Connections card.

To withdraw a cited source, choose Withdraw, say why it is no longer a source, and choose Withdraw source. The link is ended on the chain with your reason, not deleted. The primary source cannot be withdrawn, and a closed CAPA's sources cannot be changed; reopen it first. When separate issues need separate investigations, open a CAPA for each.

Analyze using free text

While the CAPA is Open, enter Root cause and Action plan under Root cause & action, then choose Record analysis. Explain the mechanism supported by the evidence, not only the symptom. The CAPA moves to In progress when analysis is recorded.

Analyze using the root cause worksheet

The structured worksheet provides three branches:

The root cause worksheet: Occurrence, Detection escape and Systemic branches, each Why able to raise its own action.
The root cause worksheet: Occurrence, Detection escape and Systemic branches, each Why able to raise its own action.

Branch Question
Occurrence Why did the problem happen?
Detection escape Why did inspection or test fail to detect it?
Systemic Why did the management or operating system allow it?
  1. Choose Add why in the appropriate branch, one statement at a time. Continue until the chain reaches a cause you can act on; the app does not require exactly five levels.
  2. Use Raise action from this why to assign a countermeasure to the specific cause, with title, assignee, detail, and due date.
  3. Correct the worksheet while Open. The last Why in a branch can be removed only when the offered control permits it and it has no linked action.
  4. Enter the explicit human-factors answer covering fatigue, training, communication, workload, or environment. If none contributed, explain the evidence for that conclusion.
  5. Review Derived root cause, then choose Complete analysis. At least an occurrence Why and the required human-factors answer are needed for the structured completion path.

Completion freezes the worksheet, retains the derived root cause and action plan, and moves the CAPA to In progress. It can record an intent to raise actions where none yet exist; that is not evidence that the actions were implemented. Continue the actual implementation workflow.

Manage actions and document changes

Use the CAPA's Raise an action item section for general follow-up and the Why-specific control for cause-linked countermeasures. Review the status of each ACT record before declaring implementation complete.

Under Document changes, select a document, add a change note, and choose Link document. Confirm that the intended document is linked. Use Unlink only when appropriate and permitted. This relationship identifies the document change needed; it does not edit the file, create an approved procedure, or make it effective. Complete the document's own revision and training-impact workflow.

Answer a customer with an 8D

When a customer asks for an 8D (a SCAR, an 8D request, a complaint response), answer it from the CAPA rather than opening a second corrective action. The CAPA stays your internal record; the 8D is the response you send.

  1. On the CAPA, find the 8D row in the side rail and choose Start an 8D. It is offered to people who can open CAPAs. Once an 8D exists, the row shows its reference and status and opens it. A CAPA has at most one 8D.
  2. Under Raise an 8D for this CAPA, enter D0 — What the customer saw, optionally D0 — Emergency response (optional), Customer reference (optional) (the customer's SCAR number, for example) and Response due (optional), then choose Raise the 8D. The CAPA's problem description, containment, root cause and action plan are carried across, so nothing is retyped, and the CAPA's analyst is carried with them.
  3. Work the steps in order. Each step's card asks for its disciplines and refuses the step, naming what is missing, until they are there.
Step Moves the 8D to What it needs
Record interim containment Contained Team named (D1), Problem described with data (D2), Interim containment in place (D3); optionally Other team members (D1, optional) and Containment verified on (D3, optional)
Record the verified cause Cause found Root cause (D4), Escape point — why it got out (D4), Cause verified, turned on and off (D4)
Choose the permanent action Action chosen Permanent corrective action (D5), Why that action was chosen (D5)
Record implementation Implemented Implementation recorded (D6), Validated in production (D6)
Close Closed Extent check — what else is affected (D7), What changed in the QMS (D7), Closure recorded (D8), Lessons shared (D8)
  1. The report shows every discipline, D0 to D8, with its answers and whatever is still outstanding. An 8D with only D0 in it shows every other discipline as outstanding rather than blank.

Containment, cause, action and implementation are recorded by CAPA investigators in the CAPA's unit; closing, sending back and cancelling need CAPA closure authority. Nobody who made the cause case can close the 8D: not the analyst named on it, anyone who recorded its cause, the linked CAPA's analyst, or, for a CAPA raised from an audit finding, the auditor and the person who recorded the finding. If the customer rejects the remedy, Send back for a different action, with Why it was sent back, returns an Implemented 8D to Action chosen. Cancel the 8D, with Why it is being cancelled, stops it at any step before Closed. Closing the 8D does not close the CAPA; verify the CAPA's effectiveness as below.

Implement and schedule verification

When the action plan has actually been implemented, enter Implementation note and Verify effectiveness by, then choose Mark implemented. The verification date is required and must be today or later at that step. The CAPA enters Verifying.

Use a meaningful verification interval. “Check the next three production lots after the fixture and instruction change” is more useful than checking immediately before the change has been exercised. The register shows overdue verification when that date passes while the CAPA remains Verifying.

Verify effectiveness

  1. Review the evidence against the intended result. Identify the period, sample, records examined, and outcome.
  2. Enter a verification note.
  3. Select Close as effective only when the evidence supports effectiveness.
  4. Select Not effective — reopen if it did not work. The CAPA returns to In progress, retains the failed verification, and clears the verification date so a later implementation can establish a new check.

The normal lifecycle is Open, In progress, Verifying, Closed. A failed check creates a loop; it is not an administrative error. Revise the work under the controls available for the current state, record implementation again, and verify again. The completed structured worksheet remains historical evidence rather than an editable explanation of the past.

Example: CAPA-0004 (rejects from fixture F-12) was marked implemented on 2026-08-20 with Verify by 2026-09-20 — "check the next three lots". Lots 4581, 4590 and 4602 ran clean, so the verification note names those three job numbers and the zero reject count, and the CAPA is closed as effective. Had lot 4590 rejected, Not effective — reopen would have sent it back to In progress with the failed check on record.

Completion check: source, cause, action, implementation, document changes, and effectiveness evidence tell one consistent story. Closing a supplier response, action item, or document revision does not automatically close the CAPA.

In the user guide

This article is chapter 25, "Corrective and Preventive Action", of the NormaQMS User Guide (NORMA-UG-001), which is under Help > User guide. Chapter numbers in the text refer to that guide.